In recent weeks, the U.S. government’s aggressive stance on tariffs has cast a long shadow over the stability of international commerce. The Administration’s strategy, characterized by threats of escalating tariffs if negotiations falter, signifies a troubling shift toward economic brinkmanship. While some may argue these tactics leverage necessary pressure to reform trade imbalances, they also
Business
In recent days, the United States has escalated its stance in the ongoing trade conflict by directly communicating tariff increases to twelve countries, cloaked in a tone that suggests coercion rather than cooperation. The move to send “take it or leave it” tariff offers signals a shift from open negotiations to an aggressive posture that
As the clock ticks down on the imminent deadline, the prospects of salvaging a meaningful trade agreement between the United States and the European Union look increasingly bleak. At stake is more than just tariffs; it is the future of a decades-old economic partnership that has fostered growth, stability, and global influence. Yet, instead of
The recent maneuvering within the U.S. House of Representatives exemplifies the chaos often masking true leadership. While the passage of the bill appears to be a victory for Republican strategists, it underscores a troubling reality: that partisan brinkmanship has become the norm, often at the expense of meaningful governance. The near-collapse of the vote amid
In a political climate dominated by nationalist and protectionist rhetoric, President Donald Trump’s announcement of a new trade deal with Vietnam presents a narrative of strategic strength and economic victory. However, beneath the surface of press releases and social media posts lies a stark reality: this deal is neither a cure-all nor an unqualified victory.
The recent passage of President Trump’s hefty legislative proposal in the Senate reflects a tumultuous and deeply divisive political process. With a razor-thin 51-50 vote, only secured through Vice President JD Vance’s decisive tie-breaker, this victory must be viewed through a critical lens. It underscores the precariousness of bipartisan cooperation and hints at underlying tensions
Canada’s recent flirtation with the digital services tax (DST) was nothing short of a diplomatic and economic blunder. The idea behind imposing a 3% levy on large tech giants such as Amazon, Google, and Meta might have sounded politically appealing—holding corporations accountable in a world where digital profits often slip through traditional tax nets. Yet,
The recent procedural victory for President Donald Trump’s so-called “big, beautiful bill” in the Senate was less a triumph and more a precarious inch forward in an uphill battle. The 51–49 vote to proceed to final debate barely passed, revealing deep fractures within the Republican Party and highlighting the severe obstacles that still face this
Thailand today finds itself teetering on the brink of renewed political chaos, driven by an increasingly embattled Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra and a surge of nationalist outrage. The recent protests in Bangkok, the largest since her rise to power in 2023, reveal deep-seated anxieties not just about border tensions with Cambodia, but about the government’s
Donald Trump’s recent branding of Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist and formidable contender in New York City’s mayoral race, as “a communist” represents a troubling distortion that exemplifies a broader trend of oversimplified political rhetoric. This tactic doesn’t merely misrepresent Mamdani’s actual positions; it actively stokes fear and confusion among voters and investors alike. Labeling